District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/25/2003
Keen v. State
Citations
- 855 So. 2d 117
- 2003 WL 21713718
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the movant was not required to provide a notarized statement supporting his allegations; “he must only provide a brief statement of facts in support of the motion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roundtree v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-08· cited 9×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-05· cited 4×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-17· cited 3×
- NORDELO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-13· cited 3×
- Burton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-30
- Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-09
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.