Wyoming Supreme Court· 8/23/2018

Buszkiewic v. State

Citations

424 P.3d 1272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, rather than making an improper “golden rule” argument, the prosecutor “requested that the jury consider the evidence using their life experiences and common sense”
“The objector should lay his finger on the particular point intended to be raised so that the trial court will have notice and an opportunity to cure the alleged error.”
“A criminal defendant . . . has the right to remain silent when questioned by officers . . . . When a defendant refuses to speak to authorities, the prosecutor may not refer to his silence to infer that he is guilty.” (citations omitted)
“A criminal defendant . . . has the right to remain silent when questioned by officers . . . . When a defendant refuses to speak to authorities, the prosecutor may not refer to his silence to infer that he is guilty.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boomgaarden, Burke, Davis, Fox, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.