District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/4/1997
Burwell v. Burwell
Citations
- 700 A.2d 219
- 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 213
- 1997 WL 539525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he divorce law contains no presumption in favor of an equal distribution of property; instead, it requires the court to divide the marital property ‘in a manner that is equitable, just and reasonable’ ”
- “The divorce law contains no presumption in favor of an equal distribution of property[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wagner, Ferren, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-06· cited 60×
- Webster v. Hope (In Re Hope)District of Columbia· 1999-03-03· cited 27×
- Barnes v. ShermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-24· cited 10×
- Young-Jones v. BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-17· cited 7×
- Sudderth v. SudderthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-17· cited 5×
- Murphy v. MurphyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-06-28· cited 5×
- Bernard v. BernardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-06-03· cited 2×
- Edmund C. Fleet v. Ericka E. FleetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-04-20
- K.C. Enterprise v. JenningsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-05-27
- Blount v. Squire PadgettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-10-14
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1973-11-13· cited 300×
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-05· cited 118×
- Andrade v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-14· cited 61×
- Cruz-Foster v. FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-17· cited 51×
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
- Sheetz v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-02· cited 32×
- Turpin v. TurpinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-25· cited 27×
- Poe v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-04-29· cited 23×
- Maldonado v. MaldonadoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-09-13· cited 23×
- Siggelkow v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-01-09· cited 22×
- Dickson v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-12-03· cited 17×
- Ifill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-07· cited 17×
- Ealey v. EaleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-14· cited 17×
- Pimble v. PimbleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-03-06· cited 16×
- Zapata v. ZapataDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-10-29· cited 16×
- Dews v. DewsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-04· cited 14×
- Bowser v. BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 13×
- Albergottie v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-11-23· cited 11×
- Joel v. JoelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-06-14· cited 11×
- Magness v. MagnessCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-09· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.