District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/14/1989
Joel v. Joel
Citations
- 559 A.2d 769
- 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 112
- 1989 WL 63586
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for further findings where trial court stated simply that wife’s non-economic contributions equalled husband’s economic contributions and imposed an equal distribution of property
- remanding for further findings where trial court stated simply that wife's non-economic contributions equalled husband's economic contributions and imposed an equal distribution of property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Belson, Terry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Graham v. GrahamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-07· cited 14×
- Burwell v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-04· cited 13×
- Weiner v. WeinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-03-17· cited 13×
- Young-Jones v. BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-17· cited 7×
- Lake v. LakeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-03· cited 3×
- Bernard v. BernardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-06-03· cited 2×
- Carter v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-09-29· cited 2×
- Primus v. PrimusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-03-08
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 3,975×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-01-31· cited 771×
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 748×
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-15· cited 186×
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-04-30· cited 78×
- Norris v. NorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-08-27· cited 43×
- McEachnie v. McEachnieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-01-19· cited 34×
- Duddles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-02-27· cited 33×
- Tydings v. TydingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-12-29· cited 20×
- McCree v. McCreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-07-27· cited 18×
- Pimble v. PimbleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-03-06· cited 16×
- Bowser v. BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 13×
- Finch v. FinchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-10-06· cited 13×
- King v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-01-24· cited 11×
- David Posnick, Bonat's Cafe, Incorporated v. Ethel Posnick, Ethel Posnick v. David Posnick, Bonat's Cafe, IncorporatedD.C. Circuit· 1955-07-07· cited 6×
- David Posnick v. Ethel PosnickD.C. Circuit· 1957-02-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.