Skip to main content

Murphy v. Murphy

Citations

  • 46 A.3d 1093
  • 2012 WL 2504894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding where we could not “meaningfully review the court’s decision” because we could “not know whether the judge simply did not credit appellant’s testimony or thought it was insufficient without independent corroboration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Ruiz, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.