Cruz-Foster v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “the past history of the case is critical to the determination whether” victim proved her case by preponderance of the evidence
• acknowledging “the Council‟s unambiguously stated preference for a generous construction of the remedial provisions of the Act”
• stating “the past history of the case is critical to the determination whether” victim proved her case by preponderance of the evidence
• remanding denial of renewal of CPO where court failed to consider past events
• remanding denial of renewal of CPO where court failed to consider past events
• remanding to permit trial judge to take into account the effect a stay-away order, in a criminal case involving the same two parties, could have upon the question of whether the CPO should be extended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).