Burns v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining why recanted testimony generally qualifies as “newly discovered evidence” for purposes of a new trial request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Archer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-06-29· cited 55×
• Hubbard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-02· cited 5×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-30· cited 4×
• NORDELO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-13· cited 3×
• Lennart S. Koo v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-29· cited 2×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-06· cited 2×
• Lennart S. Koo v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-02-11· cited 1×
• EMMANUEL BLAISE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-08-02
• Brian F. Hall v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2025-11-28

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-03-17· cited 305×
• McLin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-09-12· cited 146×
• E. J. Co. v. Sandvik Aktiebolag
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-23· cited 37×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-09· cited 23×
• Stephens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-30· cited 19×
• Kendrick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 13×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 7×
• Cammarano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-31· cited 6×