Cammarano v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an untimely application is permissible if recantation could not have been reasonably discovered prior to filing of first post-conviction relief application
• determining that recantation of testimony by key prosecution witness requires evidentiary hearing -to determine whether verdict likely would have been different had witness either not testified or had the testimony at trial' been recanted
• determining that recantation of testimony by key prosecution witness requires evidentiary hearing to determine whether verdict likely would have been different had witness either not testified or had the testimony at trial been recanted
• \Recanted testimony is treated the same as a claim of newly discovered evidence when raised in a rule 3.850 motion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).