Skip to main content

Kendrick v. State

Citations

  • 708 So. 2d 1011
  • 1998 WL 145228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that codefendant’s statement exonerating movant was newly discovered evidence because the codefendant had been unwilling previously to give it and movant would have had no other way to obtain it
  • noting that the defendant was found guilty of trafficking in cocaine and that the codefendant confessed that the cocaine was not the defendant’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.