Burket v. Aldridge, Adm'r

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that both the three-year statute of limitations and the six-month period under former Article 93, section 112 can be waived
• no relation back when deceased defendant’s personal representative is sought to be substituted for the deceased defendant
• substitution of personal administrator after expiration of limitations period does not relate back to original filing to prevent limitations bar
• Whether suit is brought against a tortfeasor during his lifetime, or against his personal representative after his death, it must be filed both within three years from date of injury and within six months from the qualification of personal representative.
• Whether suit is brought against a tortfeasor during his lifetime, or against his personal representative after his death, it must be filed both within three years from date of injury and within six months from the qualification of personal representative.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-24· cited 69×
• Richard Shofer v. Hack Company, Stuart Hack
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-06-24· cited 44×
• Marsheck v. Board of Trustees
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-12· cited 39×
• Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Christensen
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-04· cited 34×
• Finch v. LVNV Funding LLC
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-28· cited 30×
• Moul v. Pace
  D. Maryland· 1966-12-12· cited 26×
• Imbesi v. Carpenter Realty Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-01-19· cited 23×
• First National Bank v. Shpritz
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-11· cited 22×
• Stein v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-15· cited 20×
• Cromwell v. Ripley
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-08· cited 20×
• MacBride v. GULBRO, ADM'X OF ESTATE OF DOTSON
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-11-07· cited 19×
• Cain v. Midland Funding
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-30· cited 18×
• Tanner v. Hardy
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-06-21· cited 17×
• Grand-Pierre v. Montgomery County
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-12· cited 16×
• Nyitrai v. Bonis
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-07-05· cited 13×
• Greentree v. Fertitta
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-23· cited 13×
• Swam v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-16· cited 12×
• Warfel v. Brady
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-28· cited 12×
• Williams v. Hofmann Balancing Techniques, Ltd.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-05· cited 11×
• Hamilton v. Caplan
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-07· cited 11×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1944-02-28· cited 781×
• Bauserman v. Blunt
  Supreme Court· 1893-03-06· cited 147×
• Bertonazzi v. Hillman, Adm'x
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-02-14· cited 57×
• Chandlee v. Shockley
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-04-15· cited 52×
• Chandler v. Dunlop
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-02-24· cited 49×
• Hunt v. Tague
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-04· cited 25×
• Cornett v. Sandbower, Adm'r
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-06-23· cited 18×
• Ruff's Adm'r. v. Bull
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1825-12-15· cited 13×