Bauserman v. Blunt
Citations
- 147 U.S. 647
- 13 S. Ct. 466
- 37 L. Ed. 316
- 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2190
Syllabus
<p>The construction given by the Supreme Court of a State to a statute of limitations of the State will be followed by this court, even in a case decided, the other way in the Circuit Court before the decision of the state court.</p> <p>The statute of limitations of Kansas, as construed by the Supreme Court of the State, does not run while the debtor is personally absent from the State, although he retains a usual place of residence therein, where a summons upon him might be served.</p> <p>The statute of limitations of Kansas, as construed by the Supreme Court of the State, stops running at the death of the debtor, but for sir . . reasonable time only as will enable the creditor to have an administrator appointed.</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 3,153×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 1,894×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 1,766×
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court· 1941-03-31· cited 401×
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court· 1941-01-06· cited 334×
- Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court· 1895-01-07· cited 273×
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court· 1926-03-01· cited 226×
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationSecond Circuit· 1961-03-10· cited 193×
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1899-11-06· cited 166×
- Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court· 1897-04-19· cited 147×
- People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 112×
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. CohnSupreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 112×
- Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court· 1896-04-13· cited 110×
- Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court· 1898-05-09· cited 87×
- Security Trust Co. v. Black River National BankSupreme Court· 1902-12-01· cited 75×
- Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co.Third Circuit· 1979-11-14· cited 68×
- Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. MartinSupreme Court· 1925-06-01· cited 55×
- Commercial Credit Co. v. DavidsonFifth Circuit· 1940-05-22· cited 55×
- Austrian v. WilliamsSecond Circuit· 1952-08-15· cited 51×
- Hoskins Coal & Dock Corp. v. Truax Traer Coal Co.Seventh Circuit· 1951-10-17· cited 46×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court· 1892-12-12· cited 815×
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 712×
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 1828-02-26· cited 394×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court· 1892-11-21· cited 257×
- Patton's Lessee v. EastonSupreme Court· 1816-03-18· cited 203×
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court· 1862-12-15· cited 168×
- Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 166×
- Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court· 1887-01-24· cited 158×
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1884-04-07· cited 141×
- Town of South Ottawa v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1877-03-26· cited 128×
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court· 1884-03-10· cited 117×
- Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1878-12-18· cited 114×
- Shelby v. GuySupreme Court· 1826-03-18· cited 108×
- Green v. Lessee of NealSupreme Court· 1832-01-28· cited 93×
- Amy v. DubuqueSupreme Court· 1879-04-18· cited 83×
- Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court· 1889-04-08· cited 79×
- Post v. SupervisorsSupreme Court· 1882-05-18· cited 58×
- Mills v. ScottSupreme Court· 1879-02-18· cited 45×
- Barney v. OelrichsSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 40×
- Henderson v. GriffinSupreme Court· 1831-02-18· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.