Skip to main content
· 1/7/1987

Hamilton v. Caplan

Citations

  • 518 A.2d 1087
  • 69 Md. App. 566
  • 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n analyzing the applicability of [E.T. 8-103], we must examine the claim to determine whether it is in fact a claim against the estate, for only such claims are barred” by the statute.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Alpert, Pollitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.