· 1/7/1987
Hamilton v. Caplan
Citations
- 518 A.2d 1087
- 69 Md. App. 566
- 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]n analyzing the applicability of [E.T. 8-103], we must examine the claim to determine whether it is in fact a claim against the estate, for only such claims are barred” by the statute.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Alpert, Pollitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.