Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the statute of limitations would not be tolled during pendency of a motion to intervene “[a]bsent a statutory provision saving the plaintiffs rights” to bring suit upon denial of the motion to intervene
• explaining that the statute of limitations reflects a legislative judgment of what is deemed an adequate period of time in which a person of ordinary diligence should bring his action
• traditional rule concerning tolling of statutes of limitations can be fairly termed one of strict construction
• traditional rule concerning tolling of statutes of limitations can be fairly termed one of strict construction
• Absent a statutory provision saving the plaintiffs rights, a remedy is barred where limitations has run during the pendency of the defective suit
• “[wjhatever facts may have been present in Bertonazzi ... that moved us ... do not exist here”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).