State v. Couch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant notes that the trial court based its decision on [facts not alleged in the information]. That is true. It also was error.”
• “Defendant notes that the trial court based its decision on [facts not alleged in the information]. That is true. It also was error.”
• “the term ‘wildlife’ means whatever the legislature says that it means,” regardless of what it meant at common law
• a term in a statute means “whatever the legislature says that it means”
• trial court’s ruling on demurrer to charging instrument reviewed for errors of law
• when the legislature has expressly defined a term in a statute, we are “obliged to apply the legislature’s definition,” and we employ our standard methods of statutory interpretation to examine that definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dickerson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-12· cited 49×
• Burke v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-09-27· cited 29×
• Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-10· cited 21×
• McLaughlin v. Wilson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-09-12· cited 19×
• Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-06· cited 8×
• Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-01· cited 6×
• Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22· cited 4×
• State v. Dickerson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 3×
• State v. McCathern
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-28· cited 2×
• King City Rehab, LLC v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-01· cited 2×
• Eddy v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-19· cited 2×
• Loucks v. Beaver Valley's Backyard Garden Products
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-12· cited 2×
• Fleming v. SAIF
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-04· cited 2×
• Hynix Semiconductor v. Lane Cnty. Assessor, Tc-Md 091320b (or.tax 5-12-2011)
  Oregon Tax Court· 2011-05-12
• Hynix Semicond. Mfg. v. Lane County Assr., Tc-Md 091320b (or.tax 5-5-2011)
  Oregon Tax Court· 2011-05-05
• Farms v. Washington County Assessor, Tc-Md 100443d (or.tax 10-13-2011)
  Oregon Tax Court· 2011-10-13
• Mt. Bachelor Ski Education Foundation v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-10-31
• 122nd Group, LLC v. Department of Consumer & Business Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-10
• State v. Sarria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• Krieger v. Just
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-07-21· cited 82×
• State v. Snyder
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-09-23· cited 28×
• State v. Cox
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-12-31· cited 21×
• Enertrol Power Monitoring Corp. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-06· cited 13×
• State v. Couch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 12×
• SAIF Corp. v. Lewis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-11-29· cited 11×
• State v. Briggen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-12-09· cited 8×
• State v. Couch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 1×