Skip to main content

Thompson v. State

Citations

  • 408 P.3d 756
  • 2018 WY 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the state presented sufficient evidence to support the three convictions challenged by the defendant
  • “Using the standard definition of protracted, the State must prove the victim suffered a long or lengthy impairment of a bodily function.”
  • “[W]e defer to the jury as the fact-finder and assume they believed only the evidence adverse to the defendant since they found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • “[W]e do not apply waiver to a claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the defendant’s conviction.”
  • loss of hearing for one month was “sufficiently lengthy to be categorized as a protracted impairment of a bodily function”
  • “We accept all evidence favorable to the State as true . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Davis, Fox, Hill, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.