Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/21/2000

Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.

Citations

752 A.2d 26
170 Vt. 450
2000 Vt. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that statute did not commence on plaintiffs negligence claim against surveyor until he acquired evidence to “suspect that the southern boundary depicted on the survey” was inaccurate
noting that, although jury found no liability in underlying suit, trial court’s later findings supported its conclusion that defendant’s wrongdoing was proximate cause of plaintiffs litigation costs
stating that arguments that are not presented to factfinder are not preserved for appeal
explaining that conclusions will be upheld if reasonably supported by the findings
explaining that contentions not presented below are not preserved for appeal
awarding attorney’s fees where trial court concluded indemnitor breached duty to indemnitee, proximately causing indemnitee’s legal costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.