Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute did not commence on plaintiffs negligence claim against surveyor until he acquired evidence to “suspect that the southern boundary depicted on the survey” was inaccurate
• noting that, although jury found no liability in underlying suit, trial court’s later findings supported its conclusion that defendant’s wrongdoing was proximate cause of plaintiffs litigation costs
• stating that arguments that are not presented to factfinder are not preserved for appeal
• explaining that conclusions will be upheld if reasonably supported by the findings
• explaining that contentions not presented below are not preserved for appeal
• awarding attorney’s fees where trial court concluded indemnitor breached duty to indemnitee, proximately causing indemnitee’s legal costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).