In Re Appeal of Vermont Railway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ICCTA did not preempt local laws that regulated activity—a railroad's operation of a salt distributorship— \ancillary to the operations of the rail line\ that did not have \an economic impact on [the railroad's] operations\
• holding ICCTA did not preempt city’s zoning ordinance for permit for salt shed on railroad property
• finding that local zoning regulations of railroad’s salt shed operation were not preempted to the extent that they concerned traffic issues and potential environmental contamination
• explaining that deference is afforded to agency’s interpretation of statutes in subject matter in which agency possesses particular expertise and does not extend to constitutional questions
• the ICCTA did not preempt a city’s zoning conditions for a railway’s salt-shed facility
• consider agency’s interpretation of its own statute if language is ambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).