Skip to main content
· 6/23/2000

Murphy v. Stowe Club Highlands

Citations

  • 761 A.2d 688
  • 171 Vt. 144
  • 2000 Vt. LEXIS 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that determining the amount of attorney fees due under a contract involves equitable accounting
  • referring to another case where “the plaintiff’s president received a substantial capital contribution to the corporation and intentionally failed to disclose it to defendant”
  • noting the rule that punitive damages are generally not available in breach of contract action except where nonbreaching party shows tort-like conduct and actual malice on the part of breaching party
  • distinguishing (even while recognizing that there is no bright constitutional line
  • striking punitive award where, even if developer’s breach of contract deemed malicious, “malice alone is not sufficient to support an award of punitive damages in a breach of contract case” when contractor’s failure to perform not “akin to a willful and wanton, or fraudulent, tort”
  • “defendants sought a judgment as a matter of law on the punitive damages issue in compliance with VR.C.E 50(a), and renewed then' motion after entry of judgment as required by Rule 50(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.