University of Vermont v. W.R. Grace & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, on basis of discovery rule, that property damage caused by asbestos contamination in 1971 to 1972 not barred by six-year statute of limitations
• holding that discovery rule applies to 12 V.S.A. § 511
• holding that discovery rule applies to 12 V.S.A. § 511
• holding that discovery rule applies to § 511
• explaining that \it is clear that the discovery rule.. .applies even where the statute is silent on the matter” and holding that \the discovery rule should be read into [Vermont’s general six-year statute of limitations for civil actions]”
• holding “specifically that the discovery rule should be read into § 511”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).