Ninth Circuit· 9/9/1994

Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa

Citations

45 F.3d 1261
1994 WL 736945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that a federal district court may conduct a Garmon analysis \when a party has raised Garmon as a defense to a state-law claim that is properly before the district court (through diversity or supplemental jurisdiction)\
“[D]istrict courts 10 do not have original federal question jurisdiction over state-law claims which are subject to a 11 defense of Garmon preemption, and [] such claims may not be removed to federal court.”
“If the conduct arguably 13 falls within the scope of the Act, then the interest in a uniform federal labor policy 14 identified in Garmon5 requires both the states and the federal courts to defer to the 15 exclusive jurisdiction of the NLRB.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Leavy, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.