Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. Gould Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state may not prohibit state purchases from repeat labor law violators because federal law preempts labor law enforcement
• holding that a state may not prohibit state purchases from repeat labor law violators because federal law preempts labor law enforcement
• holding, in the Commerce Clause arena, that attempt to use spending power in a manner “tantamount to regulation” is subject to federal preemption
• holding, in the Commerce Clause arena, that attempt to use spending power in a manner \tantamount to regulation\ is subject to federal preemption
• emphasizing that Con gress would not have intended to allow states to interfere with the NLRA “as long as they did so through exercises of the spending power”
• emphasizing that Congress would not have intended to allow states to interfere with the NLRA “as long as they did so through exercises of the spend- ing power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).