Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Governor of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there exists \an implied right of action to assert a preemption claim seeking injunctive relief\
• holding that an immigration attorney providing services to unauthorized aliens had individual standing to bring a pre-enforcement challenge to a practically identical provision in Georgia
• holding that organizations alleging redirection of resources caused by allegedly unconstitutional statute resulted in organizational standing for plaintiffs
• holding that “enforcement of a state law at odds with the federal immigration scheme is neither benign nor equitable”
• observing that an immigration or- ganization “cancelled citizenship classes to focus on” increased in- quiries about a new law
• “Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g)(10), state officers may permissibly communicate with the federal government about ‘the immigration status of any individual,’ even absent a formalized agreement between the locality and federal government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).