Bruesewitz v. Wyeth Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that divining congressional intent regarding preemption requires considering a law’s “structure and purpose,” underlying “object and policy,” and, where relevant, legislative history (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[R]esort to legislative history is appropriate ‘when necessary to interpret ambiguous statutory text.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).