At & T Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a determination that the statutory language was unambiguous negates consideration of arguments concerning statutory purpose, non-binding case law, and legislative history
• “An appellant waives an argument in support of reversal if he does not raise that argument in his opening brief.”
• “An appellant waives an argument in support of reversal if he does not raise that argument in his opening brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).