Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 3/21/2016

Brown v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

  • 170 F. Supp. 3d 518
  • 2016 WL 1157619
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff did not engage in protected activity when he advocated on behalf of minority employees to receive promotions
  • granting summary judgment on retaliation claim where the evidence showed that “the decision had already been made to remove [the plaintiff] from his position” at the time the plaintiff engaged in protected activity
  • adverse employment actions occurring between nine and 18 months after protected activity too remote to establish causation for retaliation claim
  • “There is nothing in the record Suggesting that [the p]laintiff complained that any of these employees’ Title VII rights had been violated or that they had been discriminated against.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.