BROWN v. the STATE.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the other[-]acts evidence was properly admitted as intrinsic to the charged crime, it is not subject to the notice requirements of Rule 404 (b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Triston Parham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-06-23
• Jimmy Collum v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-06-27

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• United States v. McNair
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-05-12· cited 252×
• Bradshaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-02· cited 172×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-03-07· cited 84×
• United States v. Cora Cadia Ford
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-04-28· cited 76×
• Brewner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-08-14· cited 74×
• United States v. Utter
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-10-16· cited 69×
• State v. Frost
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-06-15· cited 60×
• Simmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-15· cited 52×
• United States v. Carlos Rodriguez Nerey
  Eleventh Circuit· 2017-12-12· cited 42×
• Reeves v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-03-03· cited 35×
• Pierce v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-30· cited 34×
• Marriott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-01· cited 28×
• Baughns v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-02-18· cited 26×
• Curry v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-02-05· cited 23×
• Rivers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-03-01· cited 18×
• Wells v. THE STATE
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-10-16· cited 17×
• Rutledge v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-11-02· cited 17×
• Satterfield v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-19· cited 14×
• United States v. Leavitt
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-08-03· cited 12×