Skip to main content
· 2/5/2015

Curry v. the State

Citations

  • 330 Ga. App. 610
  • 768 S.E.2d 791
  • 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that admissibility of Rule 404 (b) extrinsic evidence must satisfy Rule 403
  • because similar transaction evidence was relevant to show intent, we need not address trial court’s findings that it was also relevant to show motive, plan, and identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillard, Doyle, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.