Brown v. the State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress images of child pornography found on defendant’s cell phone because the defendant was suspected only of driving under the influence (“DUI”
• exigencies could include preventing imminent destruction of evidence, pursuing a fleeing suspect, or helping people who are injured or threatened with imminent injury
• \[T]he good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule ... is not applicable in Georgia in light of our legislatively-mandated exclusionary rule found in OCGA § 17-5-30 [.]\ (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).