Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/20/1996
Brown v. State
Citations
- 925 S.W.2d 216
- 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088
- 1996 WL 337078
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to review a claim that Rule 24.035(b)’s absolute deadline “operated to arbitrarily deny [the movant] his right to due process of law” because it had not been raised in the motion court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow, Prewitt, Shrum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wallar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-07-23· cited 9×
- Lilly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-08-28· cited 5×
- Valdez v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-01-23· cited 4×
- Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-07· cited 3×
- Driskill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-30· cited 2×
- TIMOTHY P. CABLE v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals· 2021-09-17
- Swain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-08-04
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-16· cited 537×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-11-22· cited 231×
- Jacobowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 225×
- Glendora v. DolanSupreme Court· 1995-05-01· cited 95×
- Amrine v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-03-13· cited 93×
- Walker v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 78×
- State v. SimpsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-07-03· cited 6×
- Reid v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-06-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.