Lilly v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• argument that time limits in Rule 24.035 violate due process was not presented to the motion court and could not be presented for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lynn v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-08· cited 19×
• Wallar v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-07-23· cited 9×
• Routt v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-12-19· cited 5×
• Johnston v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-01-31· cited 1×
• RICHARD D. MCNABB, II, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-07-23

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Day v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-16· cited 537×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1991-07-23· cited 184×
• Dorris v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2012-01-17· cited 175×
• Hoskins v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-12-07· cited 44×
• State Ex Rel. Verweire v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-01-30· cited 26×
• Goralnik v. United Fire & Casualty Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-12-11· cited 24×
• Gurley v. Missouri Board of Private Investigator Examiners
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2012-03-06· cited 22×
• State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. Rice
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-05-25· cited 21×
• Ferguson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-08-31· cited 20×
• State Ex Rel. Feltz v. Bob Sight Ford, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-05-31· cited 10×
• Brown v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-06-20· cited 7×
• Sours v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-03-06· cited 6×
• Blankenship v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-02-07· cited 5×
• Valdez v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-01-23· cited 4×