Brown v. State
Citations
- 80 Fla. 741
- 86 So. 574
Syllabus
<p>1. The granting or overruling of a motion for á hül of partiyulars made by defendant in a criminal case rests largely in the discretion of the trial court.</p> <p>2. There is no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for a bill of particulars made by defendant in a criminal case in the absence of any showing that a bill of particulars was necessary in the proper administration of justice in such case.</p> <p>3. Where a defendant in a criminal prosecution testifies as a witness in his own behalf, the State has the right on cross-examination to interrogate him as to whether he has previously been convicted of a criminal offense.</p> <p>4. It is not reversible error for the trial court to overrule objections to argument of counsel to the jury because such argument is unsound or illogical.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- Clinton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 60×
- Daly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-01-20· cited 18×
- Ex Parte S. E. Webb & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1918-11-22· cited 17×
- Branch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-12-19· cited 17×
- Squires v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.