Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 80 Fla. 741
  • 86 So. 574

Syllabus

<p>1. The granting or overruling of a motion for á hül of partiyulars made by defendant in a criminal case rests largely in the discretion of the trial court.</p> <p>2. There is no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for a bill of particulars made by defendant in a criminal case in the absence of any showing that a bill of particulars was necessary in the proper administration of justice in such case.</p> <p>3. Where a defendant in a criminal prosecution testifies as a witness in his own behalf, the State has the right on cross-examination to interrogate him as to whether he has previously been convicted of a criminal offense.</p> <p>4. It is not reversible error for the trial court to overrule objections to argument of counsel to the jury because such argument is unsound or illogical.</p>

Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.