Branch v. State
Citations
- 76 Fla. 558
Syllabus
<p>1. The question of whether a Bill of Particulars shall be furnished to a defendant upon request by him, or in his behalf, rests largely in the discretion of the Trial Court.</p> <p>2. The propriety of a motion to strike any item from a Bill of Particulars questioned.</p> <p>3. Where there is no misjoinder of offenses in an information, whether the prosecutor will be required to elect upon which of several counts contained therein he will try the accused is within the sound discretion of the Trial Court.</p> <p>4. Under the law (Sections 28, 33 and. 40, Chapter 5596, Acts of 1907, Laws of Florida), Tax Collectors of the Counties of this State are required to make remittances of State taxes eolletced by them to the State Treasurer and the original official receipts of the State Treasurer for amounts so received by him filed with the State Comptroller, so that credit therefor may be given to the Tax Collector making such remittances and a correct account kept by the State Comptroller with him, are admissable in evidence in a prosecution of such Tax Collector upon a charge of embezzlement of such taxes by such Tax Collector when such original receipts are produced by the State Comptroller and identified by him as such.</p> <p>5. Under the law (Section 40, Chapter 5596, Acts of 1907, Laws of Florida) Tax Collectors of the Counties of this State are required to make monthfy reports or “returns,” under oath, of State and County taxes collected by them and such original reports or “returns” so made are admissible in evidence in a prosecution' of the Tax Collector making them upon a charge of embezzlement of such taxes by such Tax Collector when such reports or returns are produced by the State Comptroller and identified by him as such.</p> <p>6. Copies certified by the State Comptroller under his official seal to be true and correct, of the books of account kept in the office of the State Comptroller with the Tax Collectors of the Counties of this State showing the amoun
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Maine v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia· 2009-02-27· cited 40×
- Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-09· cited 39×
- United States v. SilvermanThird Circuit· 1939-09-07· cited 15×
- Rast v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-05-10· cited 11×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1939-05-23· cited 7×
- Benjamin v. Tandem Healthcare, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-27· cited 6×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-11-29· cited 4×
- Seaman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-08-05
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 52×
- Sandy White v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 47×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 35×
- Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-10-30· cited 26×
- Bell v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 24×
- Knott v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1887-09-05· cited 15×
- State v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-07-02· cited 12×
- Huddleston v. GrahamSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-12· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.