Squires v. State
Citations
- 42 Fla. 251
Syllabus
<p>1. Where a motion for change of venue in a criminal case based upon the ground that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the county is supported only by the defendant’s affidavit, an appellate court will not reverse the ruling denying such motion in the absence of some showing that defendant was prevented from securing corroborative evidence by hostile public sentiment.</p> <p>2. Where a defendant in a criminal prosecution testifies as a witness in his own behalf, the State has the right on cross-examination to interrogate him as to whether he has previously been convicted of a criminal offence.</p> <p>3. Evidence examined and found sufficient to support the verdict.</p>
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-08· cited 99×
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 58×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 34×
- Williams v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1924-11-22· cited 25×
- Peel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-05-22· cited 22×
- McCollum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-07-20· cited 21×
- Chisolm v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-07-02· cited 13×
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-07-25· cited 12×
- Watson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-12-04· cited 9×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-11-29· cited 4×
- Stevens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-14· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.