Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 182 P.3d 624
  • 2008 Alas. App. LEXIS 46
  • 2008 WL 1759118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the Fourth Amendment offers little protection to motorists who consent to a request to search their vehicle, even when the officer has no reason to suspect that the motorist is carrying contraband
  • noting that “legal commentators have been widely critical of the United States Supreme Court’s consent-search jurisprudence”
  • stating motorists who have been stopped for a traffic violation do not act from a position of psychological independence
  • stating motorists who have been stopped for a traffic violation do not act from a position of psychological independence
  • noting motorists have a “strong interest in catering to the officer’s wishes until the officer announces [his or her] decision whether to issue a citation or only a warning”
  • noting motorists have a “strong interest in catering to the officer’s wishes until the officer announces [his or her] 28 decision whether to issue a citation or only a warning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.