District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/4/2011
Shade v. State
Citations
- 55 So. 3d 722
- 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2688
- 2011 WL 743442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for evidentiary hearing as to whether seized items of personal property were properly withheld, and on remand, requiring defendant be afforded opportunity to be present and testify at hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmer, Griffin, Sawaya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Bolden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 31×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-05· cited 27×
- Harrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-16· cited 9×
- Alfonso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-09-03· cited 6×
- Benedetti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.