Brown v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the parties conceded and the court concluded that under Maryland law, alimony awards are subject to retroactive modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Langston v. Langston
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-13· cited 50×
• Alig v. Alig
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1979-06-08· cited 39×
• Gamble v. Gamble
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1969-11-07· cited 9×
• Varone v. Varone
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-10-31· cited 6×
• Fuller v. Fuller
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-04-19· cited 4×
• King v. Fay
  District of Columbia· 1958-11-04· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. Cronkhite
  Supreme Court· 1859-03-11· cited 538×
• Barber v. Barber
  Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 184×
• Lynde v. Lynde
  Supreme Court· 1901-04-15· cited 183×
• Lynde v. Lynde; Lynde v. Lynde
  Supreme Court· 1900-11-05· cited 110×
• Miller v. Miller
  D.C. Circuit· 1941-06-30· cited 43×
• Junghans v. Junghans
  D.C. Circuit· 1940-04-22· cited 16×
• Caples v. Caples
  Fifth Circuit· 1931-03-02· cited 7×
• Cotter v. Cotter
  Ninth Circuit· 1915-08-09· cited 6×
• Plant v. Plant
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1948-02-06· cited 3×
• Hanson v. Loomis
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1937-03-04· cited 2×