Fuller v. Fuller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the parties conceded and the court concluded that under Maryland law, alimony awards are subject to retroactive modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Langston v. Langston
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-13· cited 50×
• Gamble v. Gamble
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1969-11-07· cited 9×
• Varone v. Varone
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-10-31· cited 6×
• Trigo v. RIGGS NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, DC
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-05-14· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. Griffin
  Supreme Court· 1946-04-29· cited 294×
• Kephart v. Kephart
  D.C. Circuit· 1952-03-03· cited 59×
• Darden v. Darden
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1958-09-10· cited 7×
• Brown v. Brown
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1950-08-03· cited 6×
• Diesenhof v. Glass
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1962-12-28· cited 3×