Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/19/1982
Brown v. Brown
Citations
- 292 S.E.2d 297
- 278 S.C. 43
- 1982 S.C. LEXIS 353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that while the wife’s income increased since the divorce, this increase cannot be used to justify a reduction in alimony because it was contemplated by the parties at the time of the divorce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kelley v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-21· cited 56×
- McAlister v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-21· cited 40×
- Calvert v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-11-14· cited 38×
- Christy v. ChristyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-11-04· cited 21×
- Nelson v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-05· cited 17×
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-12-10· cited 16×
- Penny v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 16×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-11· cited 11×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-05-26· cited 11×
- Lynn v. LynnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-11-03· cited 6×
- Holme v. HolmeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-11-06· cited 5×
- Medlin v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-01-25· cited 2×
- Nelson v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-03-11
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.