Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/14/1985
Calvert v. Calvert
Citations
- 336 S.E.2d 884
- 287 S.C. 130
- 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding to warrant an alimony modification, the change of circumstances must be either substantial or material
- holding a substantial or material change of circumstances must occur to warrant a modification of child support.
- refusing to adjust spousal support where alleged substantial change was known and contemplated by parties at time of decree
- finding no substantial or material change of circumstances despite reduction in Father’s income and stating “[t]he mere fact that a supporting spouse’s salary or income has been reduced does not of itself require a reduction of either alimony or child support”
- The mere fact that a supporting spouses salary or income has been reduced does not of itself require a reduction of either alimony or child support.
- “Generally, changes in circumstances within the contemplation of the parties at the time the decree was entered do not provide a basis for modifying either an alimony allowance or a child support award.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Sanders, Cureton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kelley v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-21· cited 56×
- Thornton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-13· cited 42×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 33×
- Sharps v. SharpsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-14· cited 33×
- Townsend v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-09-29· cited 29×
- Gartside v. GartsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-04-29· cited 29×
- Kneece v. KneeceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-27· cited 25×
- Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-03-02· cited 23×
- Eubank v. EubankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-05· cited 21×
- Penny v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 16×
- Hailey v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 12×
- Briggs v. Newberry County School DistrictD. South Carolina· 1992-06-09· cited 11×
- Serowski v. SerowskiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 10×
- Floyd v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-07-06· cited 8×
- Roof v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 7×
- Nicholson v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 6×
- Fischbach v. TuttleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-10-22· cited 5×
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-04-17· cited 5×
- Carol Elaine Warren v. Todd E. GarlandWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-04-10· cited 2×
- Ex Parte Petition of WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 1×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moseley v. MosierSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-08-30· cited 98×
- Jeanes v. JeanesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-11-11· cited 35×
- Darden v. WithamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-05-11· cited 27×
- Cooksey v. CookseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-10· cited 23×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-08· cited 20×
- Fender v. FenderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-07-27· cited 19×
- Botkin v. BotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-03-23· cited 19×
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-05-19· cited 18×
- Nelson v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-05· cited 17×
- Lyvers v. LyversCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-10· cited 14×
- Kane v. KaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-21· cited 13×
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-12-31· cited 13×
- Arnold v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-15· cited 12×
- Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-20· cited 10×
- Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-11-24· cited 10×
- Melton v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-03-13· cited 9×
- Condon v. CondonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-10· cited 7×
- McLeod v. Sandy Island Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-04· cited 6×
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-02-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.