Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/26/1992
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 419 S.E.2d 232
- 308 S.C. 492
- 1992 S.C. App. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an award of attorneys fees is within the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw, Cureton, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lindsay v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 69×
- Hawkins v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-07· cited 43×
- Christy v. ChristyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-11-04· cited 21×
- Green v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-13· cited 16×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-01-27· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 59×
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-05-19· cited 18×
- Croom v. CroomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-06-10· cited 14×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-11· cited 11×
- Alliegro v. AlliegroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-11-20· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.