Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 11/13/1978

Brodt v. Bache & Co.

Citations

  • 595 F.2d 459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs’ discretionary commodities trading account did not constitute security
  • broker for discretionary commodities account and investor were not engaged in a common enterprise
  • broker for discretionary commodities account and investor were not engaged in a common enterprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Kelleher, Sneed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.