Skip to main content
· 8/9/1989

Jim Long v. Shultz Cattle Company, Incorporated, an Oklahoma Corporation, and William B. Shultz

Citations

  • 881 F.2d 129
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12568
  • 1989 WL 88275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “any holding to the contrary would be inconsistent with Howey itself’
  • looking to actual evidence of investor experience and then looking to advertising method
  • crediting the jury's conclusion that investors, in practice, followed the manager's recommendations
  • looking to actual evidence of investor experience and then looking to advertising method
  • crediting the jury's conclusion that investors, in practice, followed the manager's recommendations
  • crediting the jury's conclusion that investors, in practice, followed the manager's recommendations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Williams, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.