Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,616 Christopher Stenger v. R.H. Love Galleries, Inc., and R.H. Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that horizontal commonality requires “multiple investors [to] pool their investments and receive pro rata profits.”
• “This Circuit has strictly adhered to a ‘horizontal’ test of common enterprise, under which multiple investors must pool their investments and receive pro rata profits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).