Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 8/23/1991

Brittingham v. Mobil Corp.

Citations

  • 943 F.2d 297
  • 1991 WL 160487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiffs had been injured solely by predicate acts of misrepresentation, and thus failed to allege a distinct investment injury
  • B & 0 and defendants falsely misrepresented scope of Hochwarth Stipulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldisert, Scirica, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.