Gelb v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compilation of calling cards is information that is sufficiently valuable and could alter a firm’s competitive position
• finding that nothing about AT & T's filed rate had anything to do with its advertising practice
• finding that nothing about AT&T’s filed rate had anything to do with its advertising practice
• stating that “defendants’ assertion that its competitors . . . could use [the information] to do competitive injury to the defendants is . . . a sufficient basis” for sealing
• stating that “defendants’ assertion that its competitors . . . could use [the information] to do competitive injury to the defendants is . . . a sufficient basis” for sealing
• noting that “defendants’ assertion that its competitors .. . could use [the information] to do competitive injury to the defendants is, on the facts of this case, a sufficient basis” for sealing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).