Bridges v. MacLean-Stevens Studios, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that control analysis must refer to specific transactions
• affirming summary judgment because an alleged conspiracy was \illogical\; plaintiffs presented no evidence showing that the conspirators had a motive to conspire
• affirming summary judgment for defendant on section 1 conspiracy claim on grounds that plaintiff’s claim was illogical
• affirming summary judgment for plaintiff due to lack of evidence on the recoupment element of statute
• discussing factors relevant to deciding if confinement in SHU constitutes an atypical hardship
• “Where a transaction involves a seller, buyer, and a third party, the seller-buyer line is crossed if the seller or buyer pays a commission to a third party acting as the agent or intermediary of the opposing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).