William MULLIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disparate impact claims are not cognizable under the ADEA
• holding that “disparate impact” theory is not available under the ADEA
• describing the difference between the \federal 'pretext-plus' standard and the Massachusetts 'pretext-only' standard\
• describing the difference between the \federal 'pretext-plus' standard and the Massachusetts 'pretext-only' standard\
• appellate courts need not wax longiloquent when a district court has resolved a claim correctly and explained its rationale in a well- reasoned rescript
• “[T]ectonic plates shifted when the Court decided [Hazen Paper]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).