· 8/1/2000
Hix Corp. v. National Screen Printing Equipment Inc.
Citations
- 108 F. Supp. 2d 1204
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11827
- 2000 WL 1146123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “defendants may be liable for reverse passing of by “offering for sale” a slightly modified version of plaintiff’s mug press.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vratil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.