Skip to main content
· 8/1/2000

Hix Corp. v. National Screen Printing Equipment Inc.

Citations

  • 108 F. Supp. 2d 1204
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11827
  • 2000 WL 1146123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “defendants may be liable for reverse passing of by “offering for sale” a slightly modified version of plaintiff’s mug press.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vratil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.