D.C. Circuit· 8/10/2018

Brett Steele v. James Mattis

Citations

899 F.3d 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that discriminatory comments made by a supervisor who was not the final decisionmaker were relevant when that supervisor had made such comments in the \discussions\ and \meeting\ that resulted in an adverse employment action
recognizing in the age-discrimination context that “[t]he actions of a discriminatory supervisor that feed into and causally influence the decisionmaker’s ultimate determination may also be the proximate cause of an adverse employment action”
“[N]othing in the ADEA supports the automatic imposition of a heightened pretext burden just because the defendant is an academic institution.”
“[A]t the summary judgment stage, [a] ‘he said, she said’ credibility determination must be resolved in favor of [the non-movant].”
“[A]t the summary judgment stage, [a] ‘he said, she said’ credibility determination must be resolved in favor of [the non-moving party].”
“[S]ummary judgment is proper only when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to [the non-moving party] and drawing all reasonable inferences accordingly, no reasonable jury could find in [the non-moving party’s] favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Millett, Pillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.