Skip to main content
· 7/25/1997

Paul Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage Association

Citations

  • 119 F.3d 23
  • 326 U.S. App. D.C. 224
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 282
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18992
  • 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,936
  • 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1078
  • 1997 WL 413583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employer proffered a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for negative performance evaluation by offering an evaluation that criticized the employee’s work performance and identifying specific examples of the employee’s inadequate performance
  • holding that an employer proffered a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for negative performance evaluation by offering an evaluation that criticized the employee’s work performance and identifying specific examples of the employee’s inadequate performance
  • holding that letters to employers protesting discrimination constitute protected activity
  • finding that emails showing that the employer was “critical” of its staff were sufficient evidence
  • acknowledging that her \understanding\ of \circumstances surrounding your actions thereafter\ was \the memo that [she] gave to Mr. Mbula for the request of the payment vouchers and backing sheets.\
  • noting that summary judgment must be entered against the plaintiff if he cannot “adduce evidence that could allow a reasonable trier of fact to conclude that [the defendant’s] proffered reason was a pretext for discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.